Biohacking Kompakt

Peptide & Experimental

Tesamorelin (Egrifta)

GHRH analog (growth hormone-releasing hormone), FDA-approved · TH9507, GHRH analog

Tesamorelin is a GHRH analog that is approved in the US for a narrowly defined group and whose EU application was withdrawn. No controlled study exists for healthy people without lipodystrophy.

What Tesamorelin is

Tesamorelin is a stabilized analog of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH). It stimulates the pituitary gland to release the body’s own growth hormone in natural pulses, and thereby raises IGF-1. Because the body’s own feedback loop is preserved, the approach is considered more physiological than supplying growth hormone from outside.

The approved purpose is the reduction of visceral fat, that is, the deep abdominal fat between the organs, in HIV-associated lipodystrophy. This is a fat distribution disorder under antiretroviral therapy, not overweight in the usual sense.

The target group of the studies and the target group of the marketing

All efficacy data come from a single population: people with HIV and fat accumulation in the abdomen. The evidence reviewed contains no controlled study in healthy people without lipodystrophy. Yet the substance is marketed to exactly this group: for body composition, recovery and anti-aging.

Hard endpoints have not been studied either. What was measured were fat areas, waist circumferences and liver fat fractions, that is, imaging and laboratory measures. Whether these translate into fewer heart attacks, fewer cases of diabetes or a longer life is open. This is exactly where the European regulators’ criticism also started.

What is well supported

  • Approved in the US. As Egrifta for the reduction of visceral abdominal fat in HIV-associated lipodystrophy. The basis is two randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials with around 400 participants each. In the second (404 patients over twelve months, randomized 2:1, 2 mg daily subcutaneously), visceral fat area fell by 10.9 % (21 cm²) after six months, compared with 0.6 % under placebo; over the course of the study, the authors put the reduction at around 18 %. Those switched to placebo in the extension phase lost the effect again.
  • The reduction in visceral fat is seen in four RCTs with 909 participants. The meta-analysis yields −21.47 cm² (95 % CI −34.73 to −8.22), p=0.002, with high variability between the studies (I² = 74 %). Waist circumference was consistent: −1.61 cm (−2.28 to −0.95), I² = 0 %.
  • Liver fat also decreased significantly. In a randomized, double-blind study in 61 participants (30 versus 30) over twelve months, the absolute difference was −4.1 percentage points (95 % CI −7.6 to −0.7), p=0.018.
  • The mechanism remains tied to the body’s own regulation. Tesamorelin is a stabilized analog of growth hormone-releasing hormone and stimulates the pituitary gland to a pulsatile release of its own growth hormone and IGF-1. The body’s feedback loop is preserved — this distinguishes the approach from administered growth hormone. That permanently elevated IGF-1 levels are nonetheless a safety issue remains unaffected by this.

What the studies show

Second pivotal trial: 404 participants over twelve months

The second of the two pivotal trials randomized 404 HIV patients with fat accumulation in the abdomen in a 2:1 ratio to 2 mg daily subcutaneously or placebo, over twelve months. After six months, visceral fat area had fallen by 10.9 % or 21 cm², compared with 0.6 % under placebo. Over the entire course of the study, the authors put the reduction at about 18 %. Blood glucose remained unremarkable. In the extension phase participants were randomized again; those switched to placebo lost the effect again.

Meta-analysis: fat reduction confirmed, magnitude inconsistent

A meta-analysis of four randomized trials with 909 participants found minus 21.47 cm² for visceral fat area (95 % CI -34.73 to -8.22), p=0.002, with a heterogeneity of I²=74 %. Waist circumference fell by 1.61 cm (-2.28 to -0.95) with I²=0 %, that is, very consistently across the studies. With a relative risk of 2.25 (0.98 to 5.17, p=0.06), the dropout rate was numerically more than twice as high as under placebo, without statistical significance.

Liver fat: the absolute figure

A randomized, double-blind study with 61 participants, divided evenly between two arms, examined liver fat fraction over twelve months. The difference from placebo was 4.1 percentage points absolute (95 % CI -7.6 to -0.7, p=0.018). Percentages for liver fat are often communicated as relative change, which makes the same measurement look considerably larger. The difference between relative and absolute effect is decisive here for putting the result in context.

Where the data stop

  • Effect in healthy people without lipodystrophy. No controlled study was found for this group. Transferring the HIV data is an assumption, not a finding.
  • A clinically meaningful benefit of the fat reduction. This is exactly what the responsible EMA committee objected to as not demonstrated. Areas and fractions were measured, not disease outcomes.
  • A benefit for skin, recovery or anti-aging. These endpoints were not investigated in any of the studies reviewed.
  • Long-term safety. Missing long-term safety data were one of the five objections with which the European assessment ended.

Status, approval and legal

In the US, tesamorelin is approved as Egrifta for the reduction of visceral abdominal fat in HIV-associated lipodystrophy, and only for that. Since March 2025 there has also been Egrifta WR, which only needs to be mixed once a week. According to the US prescribing information, long-term cardiovascular safety has not been established, and tesamorelin is not intended for weight loss. In Germany, no tesamorelin product is approved; the substance is listed in the annex to the German Anti-Doping Act. In sport it is prohibited at all times, in competition and in training (WADA list 2026, S2.2.4).

There is no approval in the EU. Ferrer Internacional withdrew the EU marketing authorization application on 2012-06-26 after the CHMP had not seen a positive benefit-risk balance. The five objections are the most informative part of the record: first, the reduction in fat area had not been demonstrated to be a clinically meaningful benefit; second, the population studied was not representative of European HIV patients; third, permanently elevated IGF-1 levels were a significant safety concern, specifically because of cancer risk and diabetic eye disease; fourth, long-term safety data were lacking; fifth, excess abdominal fat due to lipodystrophy could hardly be distinguished from overweight in practice.

Safety

In the second pivotal trial, blood glucose remained unremarkable. In the meta-analysis, the dropout rate under tesamorelin, with a relative risk of 2.25 (0.98 to 5.17), was numerically more than twice as high as under placebo, but at p=0.06 it missed significance. Fluid retention and joint complaints come into question as class effects of growth hormone; blood glucose should be kept in view.

The most serious documented objection concerns not an observed event but an assessment: the CHMP classified permanently elevated IGF-1 levels as a significant safety concern, citing cancer risk and diabetic eye disease. Long-term data that could settle this question were not available.

BK-Score Supported, with caveats

Human evidence7
Mechanism8
Safety data6
Hype gap3
Track record of use5

Approved in the US since 2010 – but for a very specific group: the reduction of visceral fat in HIV-associated lipodystrophy, supported by phase III trials. This approval does not exist in the EU; the applicant withdrew the application at the EMA. As a GHRH analog, stimulation of the body’s own growth hormone release has been confirmed in humans. For healthy people without lipodystrophy – the target group of the marketing – no controlled study was found. Safety 6 (previously 7): long-term data are lacking, both long-term safety studies were discontinued, and according to the US prescribing information long-term cardiovascular safety has not been established.

The score rates the state of knowledge, not the substance. “Safety data 9” means well studied – not harmless. “Track record of use 9” means used long and widely – that is not proof of efficacy.
Subjective assessment by Biohacking Kompakt based on published scoring rules – not a scientific rating and not a medical recommendation. Rules and all ratings (German)

Frequently asked questions about Tesamorelin (Egrifta)

Is tesamorelin approved in Germany?

No. The approval as Egrifta exists only in the US, for the reduction of visceral abdominal fat in HIV-associated lipodystrophy. The EU marketing authorization application was withdrawn by Ferrer Internacional on June 26, 2012, after the responsible EMA committee could not see a positive benefit-risk balance. In Germany, no tesamorelin product is approved.

Why did the EU reject tesamorelin?

The CHMP named five points. The reduction in fat area had not been demonstrated to be a clinically meaningful benefit. The population studied was not representative of European HIV patients. Permanently elevated IGF-1 levels were a significant safety concern, because of cancer risk and diabetic eye disease. Long-term safety data were lacking. And excess abdominal fat due to lipodystrophy could hardly be distinguished from overweight in practice.

Does tesamorelin also work in healthy people?

No controlled study is available on this. All efficacy data come from a single group: people with HIV and a fat distribution disorder under antiretroviral therapy. Transferring this to healthy users, who are the actual target group in the scene, is an assumption and not a study result.

How much does tesamorelin reduce abdominal fat?

In the second pivotal trial with four hundred four participants, visceral fat area fell by 10.9 percent after six months, compared with 0.6 percent under placebo. A meta-analysis of four studies with nine hundred nine participants arrives at 21.47 square centimeters less, with considerable variability, and at 1.61 centimeters less waist circumference.

How much liver fat disappears under tesamorelin?

In a randomized double-blind study with sixty-one participants, the difference from placebo after twelve months was 4.1 percentage points absolute. That is the reliable figure. Relative percentages make the same measurement appear considerably larger, without changing anything about the measured effect.

What side effects does tesamorelin have?

Fluid retention and joint complaints come into question as class effects of growth hormone, and blood glucose should be monitored. In the meta-analysis, the dropout rate under tesamorelin was numerically more than twice as high as under placebo, though without statistical significance. The EMA committee assessed permanently elevated IGF-1 levels as a significant safety concern.

The podcast episode (in German)

Episode 49

Sermorelin & Tesamorelin: The GHRH classics fact-checked

The podcast by Paul Höser (Episode 49) · with Paul & Paula. Double episode and finale of the growth hormone series: sermorelin as the affordable, physiological classic of US anti-aging clinics – and tesamorelin (Egrifta) with the strongest data in the class: −15 % visceral fat (Falutz, NEJM 2007) and more than a third less liver fat (Stanley, Lancet HIV 2019). Information only, no dosing or usage recommendation.

Listen on Spotify

Related

Sources

Open in the database – with search, filters and comparison (German app)

Information only, not medical advice and not a usage or dosage recommendation. Prescription-only and unapproved substances belong in the hands of a physician. Last updated: 2026-10-04.