Peptide & experimental
NAD+ as nasal spray and injection
Coenzyme (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), not approved in these dosage forms · NAD+ nasal spray, NAD+ injection, subcutaneous NAD+, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
NAD+ as a nasal spray or as a small injection under the skin is supposed to cut out the detour via the precursors NMN and NR and do without an hours-long infusion. So far, NAD+ has been injected under the skin in one preliminary safety study in 6 people over 3 days, without notable side effects. For the nasal spray there are only experiments in rats and mice. A study on energy, focus or aging exists for neither route.
What NAD+ as nasal spray and injection is
NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) is a coenzyme that every cell needs for energy metabolism and that enzymes such as sirtuins and PARP consume. In the longevity field there are three ways to raise its level: the precursors NMN and NR taken by mouth, the intravenous infusion and, the subject here, NAD+ sprayed directly into the nose or given with a small injection under the skin.
This page covers only the nasal spray and the injection. What has been shown for the precursors, such as the rise of NAD+ in the blood after NR, cannot be transferred: it is a different substance on a different route. What is rated is the state of knowledge, and for both dosage forms it is thin.
How it is supposed to work
With the nasal spray, the idea is to bring NAD+ via the olfactory mucosa directly toward the brain. In rats, the NAD+ content in the brain did indeed rise after intranasal administration. With the injection under the skin, NAD+ is supposed to bypass the digestive tract, where it would be broken down.
What remains open is how much of it reaches the cells intact. Infused intravenously in humans, it disappeared completely from the blood plasma within the first 2 hours, and the breakdown products were consistent with enzymes that break down NAD+ outside the cells. Whether the nose or the skin changes anything about this has not been measured in humans.
What is well supported
- Injections under the skin have been given in the short term. In a randomized pilot study, 6 people received NAD+ under the skin on 3 days, 4 into the muscle and 5 into the vein. All remained in the study until the end; unexpected side effects attributable to the injections did not occur. That is a safety signal for 3 days, not proof of efficacy.
- Via the nose, NAD+ reaches the brain in rats. After intranasal administration, the NAD+ content in the rat brain rose, and after an artificially induced stroke the infarcts were smaller. Nicotinamide given by the same route had no effect.
- What happens to NAD+ in the blood has been measured in humans. NAD+ given intravenously is rapidly removed from the plasma and broken down. This comes from a pilot study with a 6-hour infusion and is the most important clue to how NAD+ behaves outside the cells.
What the studies show
Nkrumah-Elie 2026: three routes, a handful of people each
A preprint from 2026, that is, not yet peer-reviewed, summarizes two pilot studies. In the first, 45 people were divided into nine groups: placebo, NR or NAD+, each into the muscle, into the vein or under the skin, once daily on 3 days. 6 people received NAD+ under the skin. Vital signs, blood values, participant reports and side effects were measured, not any effect on energy or performance. All participants stayed in; the injections were associated with discomfort but well tolerated. The second study tested only NR in 39 people; there, 45.9 percent reported pain lasting longer than 2 minutes after the injection. A registered study with the same design of NR, NAD+ and placebo on three routes (NCT06919328) names pain at the injection site as its primary outcome.
Grant 2019: what happens to NAD+ in the blood
In a pilot study, healthy people received NAD+ intravenously for 6 hours. In the first 2 hours, neither NAD+ in the plasma nor any of its breakdown products rose; the administered NAD+ was rapidly and completely removed from the plasma. The breakdown products pointed to enzymes that cleave NAD+ outside the cells. After 6 hours, NAD+ and methylnicotinamide were increasingly excreted in the urine. The study concerns the vein, not the nose or the skin. But it shows that administered NAD+ does not simply arrive in the cells as NAD+.
Ying 2007: rats, stroke, nose
In rats with a temporarily occluded brain artery, intranasal NAD+ raised the NAD+ content in the brain. Given two hours after the onset of the circulatory disturbance, it reduced infarct size after 24 and 72 hours and alleviated the neurological deficits. Nicotinamide given by the same route had no effect. This is an acute model in animals, not an indication of an effect in healthy people.
Yoo 2026: mice without a sense of smell
In mice whose olfactory mucosa had been chemically damaged, intranasal NAD+ improved the sense of smell and the repair of the mucosa. In cell culture, NAD+ promoted the maturation of human olfactory stem cells into olfactory nerve cells. The paper is the first trace of a possible medical application in the nose, but it has not been tested in humans.
Where the data stop
- Any effect in humans. For energy, concentration, sleep, recovery or aging there is no study with a control group, neither for the nasal spray nor for the injection.
- The nasal spray at all. There is not a single study in humans, not even on tolerability on the nasal mucosa or on whether appreciable amounts are absorbed.
- Whether NAD+ reaches the cells. All that has been measured is that NAD+ given intravenously is rapidly broken down in the plasma. For the skin and the nose, such measurements are lacking.
- Transferability from NMN, NR and infusion. The data on the precursors and on the infusion concern other substances or other routes and do not automatically apply to the nasal spray and the injection.
- Longer use. The longest observation of NAD+ under the skin covers 3 days in 6 people.
Status, approval and legal
In Germany and the EU, no approved medicine containing NAD+ as a nasal spray or injection was found during research. Nasal sprays and injections are not foods, because under EU law foods are products intended to be ingested. Products intended to influence bodily functions are medicines; without approval they may not be placed on the market under § 21 of the German Medicines Act (Arzneimittelgesetz).
It is different when swallowed: the European Commission’s Novel Food Catalogue classifies NAD+ in food supplements as not novel (entry of February 1, 2024). A capsule containing NAD+ therefore does not need novel food authorization, but a nasal spray or an injection does not fall under food law at all.
Safety
For the nasal spray there are no safety data in humans. For the injection under the skin they come from a preprint with 6 people over 3 days: no unexpected side effects attributable to the injection, but discomfort at the injection site. In the follow-up study with the related NR, 45.9 percent complained of pain lasting longer than 2 minutes after the injection and 43.2 percent of muscle soreness or tension.
On top of this come the risks of the route itself. Products from the gray market are not tested for purity and sterility; self-mixed solutions and injections carry the risk of infections at the injection site. Long-term and interaction data are completely lacking.
BK-Score Hype far ahead of evidence
| Human evidence | 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | 3 | |
| Safety data | 2 | |
| Hype gap | 2 | |
| Track record of use | 3 |
Evidence 2, because there is no efficacy study in humans for either route: NAD+ has been injected under the skin only in one randomized pilot study in 6 people over 3 days, analyzed for tolerability and so far published only as a preprint (Nkrumah-Elie 2026); for the nasal spray there are exclusively rat and mouse data (Ying 2007; Yoo 2026). Mechanism 3, because intranasal NAD+ raised the NAD+ content in the brain in rats, but in humans it is open how much intact NAD+ arrives – given intravenously, it disappeared completely from the plasma within the first 2 hours (Grant 2019). Safety 2, because there are no data for the nasal spray and only three-day data in 6 people for the injection. Hype 2, because energy, focus and anti-aging are promised without any of these effects ever having been measured in humans on these routes. Use 3, because both forms have only been spreading for a few years via longevity clinics and the gray market, without approval. Direction open, because there is no endpoint in humans that speaks for or against a benefit.
The score rates the state of knowledge, not the substance. “Safety data 9” means well studied – not harmless. “Track record of use 9” means used long and widely – that is not proof of efficacy.
Subjective assessment by Biohacking Kompakt based on published scoring rules – not a scientific rating and not a medical recommendation. Rules and all ratings (German)
Frequently asked questions about NAD+ as nasal spray and injection
Does NAD+ work as a nasal spray?
That has not been studied in humans. There are only animal experiments: in rats, intranasal NAD+ raised the NAD+ content in the brain and reduced infarct size after an artificially induced stroke; in mice it helped after chemically induced loss of smell. Studies on energy, focus or aging do not exist.
Is NAD+ under the skin better than NMN or NR?
That has not been compared. For the precursors NMN and NR there are placebo-controlled studies showing a rise of NAD+ in the blood. For NAD+ under the skin there is only a safety analysis in 6 people over 3 days, without measuring any effect.
Does NAD+ from a nasal spray reach the brain?
In rats, yes; there the NAD+ content in the brain rose after intranasal administration. In humans this has never been measured. NAD+ given intravenously is rapidly broken down in the blood, so it cannot simply be assumed that it reaches the cells intact.
Is an NAD+ nasal spray permitted in Germany?
No approved medicine containing NAD+ as a nasal spray or injection was found during research. Nasal sprays and injections are not foods; as products intended to influence bodily functions they would be medicines, which may not be placed on the market without approval. NAD+ taken by mouth, by contrast, is considered not novel in food supplements.
What side effects does NAD+ have as an injection?
In a preliminary study with 6 people over 3 days, no unexpected side effects attributable to the injection occurred, but the injections were associated with discomfort. In the follow-up study with NR, almost half reported pain lasting longer than 2 minutes after the injection. Long-term data are lacking.
Related
- Related topicNAD+ infusion
- Related topicNMNH (reduced NMN)
- Related topic5-Amino-1MQ
- Same sectionOrexin B
- Same sectionFullerene C60 in olive oil
- Same sectionSelank
Sources
- Nkrumah-Elie Y et al., medRxiv 2026 (preprint) – preliminary safety analysis of two pilot studies with subcutaneous, intramuscular and intravenous injections of NR and NAD+
- Grant R et al., Front Aging Neurosci 2019 – NAD+ metabolome in plasma and urine during a 6-hour NAD+ infusion, pilot study
- Ying W et al., Front Biosci 2007 – intranasal NAD+ reduces brain damage in rats after transient ischemia
- Yoo SH et al., Exp Mol Med 2026 – intranasal NAD+ in loss of smell, mouse and human olfactory stem cells
- ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06919328 – uptake and tolerability of injected NR compared with NAD+, randomized, blinded
- ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07251608 – safety study with repeated subcutaneous and intramuscular injections of NR over 100 days
- European Commission, Novel Food Catalogue – Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+): not novel in food supplements
- Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, Article 2 – definition of food
- German Medicines Act (AMG) § 21 – marketing authorization requirement
Open in the database – with search, filters and comparison (German app)
Information only, not medical advice and not a usage or dosage recommendation. Prescription-only and unapproved substances belong in the hands of a physician. Last updated: 2026-10-05.