Biohacking Kompakt

Peptide & Experimental

Methyltrienolone (Metribolone, R1881)

Oral anabolic-androgenic steroid, 17α-methylated trenbolone; never approved as a medicine, today a research tool · Metribolon, Metribolone, Methyltrienolone, R1881, R 1881, NSC-92858, 17α-methyltrenbolone, 17β-hydroxy-17α-methylestra-4,9,11-trien-3-one

Methyltrienolone, known in the laboratory as R1881 and in anti-doping law as metribolone, is trenbolone with an additional methyl group – and one of the most potent androgens ever made. In the 1960s it was briefly tested in humans, including against advanced breast cancer, but it never came onto the market. It made its real career in research: as a tool for measuring androgen receptors.

In short

What sets methyltrienolone apart is its binding strength: at the androgen receptor it binds more tightly than the body’s own DHT, and unlike DHT it is not intercepted by transport proteins in the blood. That is why it became the standard ligand of hormone research in the 1970s. In humans there are only small papers from the 1960s, on protein building and on breast cancer therapy; their results can only be read in the originals. According to a review, development failed because the substance is strongly liver-toxic even at very low doses. There is no controlled study on muscle or strength. In Germany the substance is listed in the annex of the Anti-Doping Act, and in sport it is prohibited at all times.

What methyltrienolone is and how it works

Methyltrienolone has the chemical name 17β-hydroxy-17α-methylestra-4,9,11-trien-3-one. It corresponds to trenbolone with a methyl group in the 17α position, which makes it effective as a tablet but puts more strain on the liver. A review describes it as a 17α-methylated trenbolone that was widely used in research as a ligand and photoaffinity label for the androgen receptor (Tauchen 2021).

Its importance for research is explained by two properties. First, it binds to the androgen receptor more tightly than the body’s own androstanolone, DHT, as measured in rat prostate tissue. Second, unlike the body’s own androgens, it is not bound by transport proteins in the blood. This made it possible to measure androgen receptors in human tumors as well, without traces of blood distorting the result (Bonne and Raynaud 1975). In human prostate tissue it was shown to also dock onto a binding site with properties of the progesterone receptor (Menon 1978). In cell experiments it also binds to the mineralocorticoid receptor as tightly as aldosterone, but does not activate it; instead it blocks it (Takeda 2007). An overview of the substance group can be found under Anabolic steroids (anabolics, AAS).

What is well supported

What is well supported is the pharmacology in the laboratory: methyltrienolone is a very potent ligand of the androgen receptor that is freely available in the blood, and its binding to human tissues has been precisely described since the 1970s. It is also documented that the substance was tested in humans in the 1960s and then not developed further. There are no controlled data on its effect in the human body.

What the studies show

The early clinical papers

In 1965 a paper appeared in France with the title “Protein building in humans by a new steroid: methyltrienolone” (Trémolières 1965). In 1966 a paper on the liver toxicity of the new anabolic followed (Krüskemper and Noell 1966), and in 1970 a study on efficacy and toxicity in advanced breast cancer (Halden 1970). No abstract is available for any of these papers; patient numbers and results therefore cannot be reported here.

Why it never came onto the market

A review on the medical use of testosterone and related steroids summarizes: methyltrienolone was considered as a treatment for advanced breast cancer in women, but was never marketed for medicine because it is strongly liver-toxic even at very low doses (Tauchen 2021).

Receptor studies in human tissue

Menon 1978 used methyltrienolone to examine tissue from 30 enlarged prostates and other male tissues. In 29 of 30 samples, high-affinity binding was found. In the cell nucleus it behaved like an androgen receptor, whereas in the cytoplasm of the prostate it behaved more like a progesterone receptor. This was important for research, because measurements with methyltrienolone have to be interpreted differently depending on the tissue.

A case report from the present

Fisler 2018 describes a 56-year-old man who injected steroids bought on the internet. According to the label, they contained testosterone propionate, testosterone acetate, drostanolone propionate and methyltrienolone. He developed severe jaundice and kidney damage in which bile pigments blocked the renal tubules; 4 weeks of dialysis were necessary, after which the liver and kidneys recovered. The doctors did not have the contents of the ampoules analyzed; what part methyltrienolone played remains open.

Where the data stop

There is no controlled study of methyltrienolone in humans, neither on efficacy nor on safety. The early papers are small, old and accessible only in the original. How strongly the substance builds muscle in humans, how quickly it is broken down and in what amount it damages the liver has not been quantified.

The case report also helps only to a limited extent: the man took several steroids, and whether the label was correct was not checked. Laboratory research with methyltrienolone is extensive, but says little about the effect of taking it.

Status, approval and legal

Methyltrienolone is not approved as a medicine in Germany, the EU or the US and was never marketed for medicine (Tauchen 2021). In research it has been used since the 1970s as a ligand for androgen receptors.

In Germany it is listed by name as metribolone, synonym methyltrienolone, in the annex of the Anti-Doping Act: manufacturing, trading and placing it on the market for doping are prohibited, as are acquisition, possession and bringing it into the country in more than a small quantity for doping in sport (§ 2, punishable under § 4). On the WADA Prohibited List 2026 it is listed under S1.1 as metribolone and is prohibited at all times.

Safety

The central risk is the liver. As early as 1966 a paper dealt with the liver toxicity of the substance (Krüskemper and Noell 1966), and a recent review calls it strongly liver-toxic even at very low doses (Tauchen 2021). For the group of 17α-methylated steroids, cholestasis, peliosis hepatis and liver tumors have been described, see Methasterone (Superdrol) and Oxymetholone (Anadrol).

In addition, there is the effect on the mineralocorticoid receptor shown in cell experiments (Takeda 2007); what it means for salt and water balance in humans has not been studied. The general risks of anabolic steroids for the hormone axis, heart and psyche also apply here, see Anabolic steroids (anabolics, AAS). There are no substance-specific data on this.

BK-Score Hype far ahead of evidence

Human evidence2
Mechanism7
Safety data2
Hype gap2
Track record of use2

Evidence 2, because there are only small clinical papers from the 1960s – on protein building in humans (Trémolières 1965) and on efficacy and toxicity in advanced breast cancer (Halden 1970) – whose results are not available as abstracts; there is no controlled study on muscle mass, strength or performance, so the direction is open. Mechanism 7, because binding to androgen receptors has been precisely measured since the 1970s, including in human tissue (Bonne and Raynaud 1975, Menon 1978), and effects at other receptors such as the mineralocorticoid receptor are known (Takeda 2007), but the effect in the human body has never been quantified. Safety 2, because on safety there is only an early paper on liver toxicity (Krüskemper and Noell 1966), a review’s assessment that the substance is strongly liver-toxic even at very low doses (Tauchen 2021), and a case report involving several steroids (Fisler 2018); a low number here means barely studied, not harmless. Hype 2, because a substance whose development as a medicine failed due to liver toxicity today appears on the labels of black-market steroids, without any human data on its effect. Use 2, because methyltrienolone was never used medically and was only briefly tested in humans in the 1960s. For comparison: trenbolone (2/5/3/2/4) as the parent substance, methasterone (1/5/3/1/3), Oral-Turinabol (3/6/4/3/6).

The score rates the state of knowledge, not the substance. “Safety data 9” means well studied – not harmless.
Subjective assessment by Biohacking Kompakt based on published scoring rules – not a scientific rating and not a medical recommendation. Rules and all ratings (German)

Frequently asked questions about methyltrienolone

What is methyltrienolone?

A very potent androgen, chemically trenbolone with an additional methyl group. It is also called metribolone or R1881 and has served in research since the 1970s as a ligand for androgen receptors.

Was methyltrienolone ever used as a medicine?

No. It was tested in humans in the 1960s, including in advanced breast cancer, but never came onto the market. According to a review, this was due to its strong liver toxicity even at very low doses.

Is the effect on muscles established?

No. There is no controlled study on muscle mass, strength or performance. A paper from 1965 describes protein building in humans, but the results are only available in the French original.

What is the difference from trenbolone?

Methyltrienolone carries an additional methyl group in the 17α position. It makes it effective as a tablet, but puts more strain on the liver.

Is methyltrienolone permitted in Germany?

No. It is not an approved medicine, is listed by name as metribolone in the annex of the Anti-Doping Act and is prohibited in sport at all times.

Related

Sources

Open in the database – with search, filters and comparison (German app)

Information only, not medical advice and not a usage or dosage recommendation. Prescription-only and unapproved substances belong in the hands of a physician. Last updated: 2026-10-09.