Supplement
Arjuna
Herbs · Terminalia arjuna, arjuna bark, arjun
Arjuna is the bark of an Indian tree that is regarded as a heart remedy in Ayurveda. In small studies, angina symptoms, blood pressure and individual blood lipid values declined. The largest placebo-controlled trial in heart failure, by contrast, found no better pump function, and almost all data come from short studies in India.
What arjuna is
Arjuna is the dried stem bark of Terminalia arjuna, a tree from India. It is used as a powder or as an extract. According to Bharani 2002, a bark extract used in studies contains, among other things, arjunic acid and terminic acid, glycosides such as arjunetin and arjunosides I to IV, plus flavones, tannins and oligomeric proanthocyanidins.
In the BK-Score, human evidence stands at 5 out of 10 points. This axis rates the state of knowledge, not the substance: there are several randomized trials, but they are small, short and almost all from India. The heart strengthening with which arjuna is marketed has not been shown on the hardest outcome measure.
How it works
The antioxidant constituents of the bark are held responsible for the effect on the heart. In humans, this has only been measured via surrogate markers: in the study by Gupta 2001, lipid peroxides in the blood fell by 29.3 percent after 30 days of bark powder, and by 36.4 percent under vitamin E. In the heart failure study by Maulik 2016, the activity of the protective enzyme catalase in red blood cells was better preserved under arjuna than under placebo.
A plausible mechanism is not yet a clinical benefit. Which constituent in what amount is supposed to trigger the observed effects on angina or blood pressure has not been clarified in humans.
What is well supported
- Fewer angina symptoms in a double-blind trial. In 58 men with stable angina, attacks declined under arjuna and treadmill exercise duration increased, similar to the nitrate isosorbide mononitrate. Each treatment phase, however, lasted only one week.
- Lower heart muscle mass in the meta-analysis. Across 9 randomized trials with 537 people with heart failure, left ventricular mass fell (mean difference −44.32) with no heterogeneity between the trials, and HDL cholesterol rose (mean difference 3.53).
- Good tolerability over short periods. In the largest single trial, the extract was well tolerated over 12 weeks; in the studies on angina and blood pressure, no relevant side effects were reported.
What the studies show
Heart failure: the 2026 meta-analysis and the largest single trial
Kumar 2026 pooled 9 randomized trials with 537 patients. Left ventricular mass fell markedly; ejection fraction rose by 1.85 percentage points, which missed significance (p = 0.1). Blood pressure, triglycerides and LDL did not change. The largest single trial, Maulik 2016, gave 100 patients with NYHA class II heart failure and an ejection fraction of at most 40 percent arjuna extract or placebo for 12 weeks in addition to standard therapy, double-blind. Ejection fraction as the primary endpoint remained unchanged (24.3 versus 25.5 percent), as did walking distance, quality of life, BNP and inflammatory markers. Better values appeared only in post hoc subgroup analyses.
Stable angina: Bharani 2002
In a double-blind crossover trial, 58 men with stable angina and exercise-induced ischemia each received arjuna extract, isosorbide mononitrate or placebo for one week. Under arjuna they needed less nitrate spray (5.69 versus 18.22 mg per week), exercise duration rose from 4.76 to 6.14 minutes, and ST depression in the exercise ECG decreased. There was no significant difference between arjuna and the nitrate. Women were not studied.
Severe heart failure: Bharani 1995
Twelve patients with treatment-resistant NYHA class IV heart failure received arjuna or placebo for two weeks each in a double-blind crossover, in addition to standard therapy. Under arjuna, ejection fraction was 35.3 instead of 30.2 percent, and heart volumes were smaller. The subsequent long-term follow-up over about two years was open-label, without a comparison group.
Blood pressure and blood lipids: Nazir 2026 and Gupta 2001
Nazir 2026 assigned 44 people with stage 1 hypertension to arjuna or placebo; all also took telmisartan. After 28 days, blood pressure fell in both groups, more so under arjuna; cholesterol and triglycerides also declined. The trial was triple-blind and registered. Gupta 2001 compared placebo, vitamin E and arjuna powder over 30 days in 105 patients with coronary heart disease. In the arjuna group, total cholesterol fell by 9.7 percent and LDL by 15.8 percent from baseline; a direct statistical comparison with placebo is not reported in the abstract.
Where the data stop
- Better pump function in heart failure. The largest placebo-controlled trial found no effect on ejection fraction, and in the meta-analysis it missed significance. The positive data from Bharani 1995 come from 12 patients.
- Hard endpoints. None of the studies evaluated here examined heart attacks, hospital admissions or deaths as an outcome.
- Transferability. Almost all studies come from India, are small and short, some with one-week treatment phases. The angina trial included only men.
- Comparability of products. Bark powder, extracts and aqueous extracts were tested in different amounts. Results for one extract cannot simply be transferred to another product.
Status, approval and legal
In Germany, arjuna is sold as a food supplement. There are no authorized health claims for it: the EU list under Regulation 432/2012 contains no claim on arjuna or Terminalia.
In 2020, the Joint Expert Commission of BVL and BfArM stated that products of the Ayurvedic tradition can be foods or medicines depending on their ingredients, dosage, pharmacological action and presentation, that for foods it must be checked whether they are novel foods, and that in general they must be assessed case by case. The statement does not contain a specific classification of arjuna.
Safety
In the studies, no relevant side effects were reported over periods from days up to 12 weeks. Long-term data are lacking, as are data on pregnancy, breastfeeding and children. In the BK-Score, safety stands at 3 out of 10 points; this axis measures how well safety has been studied, not how safe the substance is.
Product quality is a separate issue. According to the BVL and BfArM expert commission, the quality of Ayurvedic products is very heterogeneous; experts from official food control found very high levels of lead, mercury and arsenic in individual imported Ayurvedic food supplements. Because the studies almost always tested arjuna in addition to heart medication without systematically examining interactions, taking it with heart disease should be coordinated with a physician. This text is information and does not replace medical advice.
BK-Score Thin human evidence
| Human evidence | 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | 3 | |
| Safety data | 3 | |
| Hype gap | 4 | |
| Track record of use | 6 |
Evidence 5, because there are several randomized trials, but they are small, short and almost all from India: positive in stable angina with one-week treatment phases (Bharani 2002, 58 men), no effect on ejection fraction in the largest placebo-controlled trial in heart failure (Maulik 2016, 100 patients); the meta-analysis of 9 trials with 537 patients finds lower left ventricular mass and higher HDL, but no significantly better ejection fraction (Kumar 2026). Mechanism 3, because constituents such as triterpene acids, glycosides and flavones have been identified, but a chain of action confirmed in humans is lacking. Safety 3, because only short-term data over days to 12 weeks are available and, according to the BVL and BfArM expert commission, the quality of Ayurvedic products varies widely. Hype 4, because arjuna is marketed as heart strengthening, while pump function remained unchanged in the largest trial. Use 6, because the bark has long been used in Ayurveda, but systematic recording of side effects is lacking. Direction mixed: positive findings on angina, blood pressure and blood lipids alongside a negative trial on cardiac performance.
The score rates the state of knowledge, not the substance. “Safety data 9” means well studied – not harmless. “Track record of use 9” means used long and widely – that is not proof of efficacy.
Subjective assessment by Biohacking Kompakt based on published scoring rules – not a scientific rating and not a medical recommendation. Rules and all ratings (German)
Frequently asked questions about arjuna
What is arjuna?
Arjuna is the dried stem bark of the Indian tree Terminalia arjuna. In Ayurveda it is traditionally used for heart complaints. Among other things, it contains triterpene acids such as arjunic acid, glycosides, flavones and tannins, and it is sold as a powder or extract.
Does arjuna help with heart failure?
That has not been shown. In the largest placebo-controlled trial with 100 patients, ejection fraction did not change after 12 weeks. A meta-analysis of 9 trials found lower heart muscle mass and higher HDL, but ejection fraction did not improve significantly.
Does arjuna help with angina pectoris?
In a double-blind crossover trial with 58 men, attacks and nitrate use declined under arjuna and exercise capacity rose, similar to isosorbide mononitrate. Each phase lasted only one week, women were not studied, and replication by other groups is lacking.
Does arjuna lower blood pressure?
In a triple-blind trial with 44 people with stage 1 hypertension, blood pressure fell more under arjuna than under placebo after 28 days; all participants also took telmisartan. In the meta-analysis on heart failure, by contrast, blood pressure did not change.
Is arjuna permitted in Germany?
Arjuna is sold as a food supplement. There are no authorized health claims. According to the statement of the BVL and BfArM expert commission, Ayurvedic products must be classified case by case, including with regard to their status as a novel food.
What are the risks of arjuna?
No relevant side effects were reported in the short studies; long-term data are lacking. Ayurvedic products vary widely in quality, and official inspections found high levels of lead, mercury and arsenic in individual products. If you take heart medication, consulting a physician is advisable.
Related
- Same goal: heart & circulationBlack garlic
- Same goal: heart & circulationRed yeast rice
- Same goal: heart & circulationHydroxytyrosol and olive polyphenols
- Same goal: heart & circulationGreen tea extract (EGCG)
- Same goal: heart & circulationKrill oil
- Same goal: heart & circulationCitrus bergamot
Sources
- Kumar A et al., Ann Afr Med 2026 – meta-analysis, 9 randomized trials, 537 patients with heart failure
- Maulik SK et al., Phytomedicine 2016 – double-blind trial, 100 patients with chronic heart failure over 12 weeks
- Bharani A et al., Indian Heart J 2002 – double-blind crossover trial, 58 men with stable angina, comparison with isosorbide mononitrate
- Bharani A et al., Int J Cardiol 1995 – double-blind crossover trial, 12 patients with severe heart failure
- Gupta R et al., J Assoc Physicians India 2001 – randomized trial, 105 patients with coronary heart disease, blood lipids and lipid peroxides
- Nazir A et al., Explore (NY) 2026 – triple-blind trial, 44 people with stage 1 hypertension
- Joint Expert Commission BVL/BfArM 2020 – statement on the classification of products of the Ayurvedic tradition (01/2020)
- Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 – list of permitted health claims made on foods
Open in the database – with search, filters and comparison (German app)
Information only, not medical advice and not a usage or dosage recommendation. Prescription-only and unapproved substances belong in the hands of a physician. Last updated: 2026-10-05.