Peptide & Experimental
SGLT2 inhibitors (empagliflozin, dapagliflozin)
SGLT2 inhibitors (antidiabetics with heart and kidney protection), approved, prescription-only, longevity candidate · gliflozins, SGLT2 inhibitors, empagliflozin (Jardiance), dapagliflozin (Forxiga, Farxiga in the US), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors
Empagliflozin and dapagliflozin are diabetes drugs that let excess sugar be excreted via the kidney. In large trials they protected the heart and kidneys so clearly that today they are also used in heart failure and kidney disease without diabetes. It is precisely this breadth that makes them interesting for the longevity scene, even though data in healthy people are still lacking.
In short
SGLT2 inhibitors block the transporter in the kidney that brings sugar from the urine back into the blood. People with type 2 diabetes thus excrete on average about 78 g of glucose per day, which lowers blood sugar, weight and blood pressure. In several large randomized trials with tens of thousands of patients combined, hospital stays for heart failure, the progression of kidney disease and in some cases mortality fell, in people with and without diabetes. For a longer life in healthy people, by contrast, there are only mouse data and observational studies. The drugs are prescription-only, use as a longevity drug is off-label, and the risk of ketoacidosis deserves attention, especially with fasting and a ketogenic diet.
What it is
SGLT2 stands for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2. It is located almost exclusively in the kidney, where it brings most of the filtered sugar back into the blood. Empagliflozin, approved in the EU as Jardiance since 2014, and dapagliflozin, approved as Forxiga since 2012, specifically inhibit this transporter. According to the prescribing information, empagliflozin is 5,000 times more selective for SGLT2 than for the intestinal transporter SGLT1.
Originally, both came onto the market as diabetes drugs. Today they are also approved in the EU for chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease, including in people without diabetes. Canagliflozin belongs to the same class and has its own entry on this site, where the lifespan data from the ITP mouse program can also be found.
How it is supposed to work
The direct effect is measurable and well understood. When the transporter is blocked, sugar ends up in the urine. In type 2 diabetes, this was on average about 78 g per day in the approval studies. That means a loss of calories, less body fat and somewhat less weight. In a 24-week study, body weight under empagliflozin was 1.93 kg lower than under placebo, and systolic blood pressure 2.6 mmHg lower. At the same time, the kidney excretes more sodium, which relieves the circulation and the heart.
Beyond this, a second mechanism is under discussion. A much-cited hypothesis paper in Diabetes Care formulated the idea in 2020 that SGLT2 inhibitors put cells into a fasting-like state, with energy-deficiency signals otherwise known from calorie restriction. That would explain why the benefit for the heart and kidneys is greater than the lowering of blood sugar alone would suggest. This fasting mimicry has not been proven in humans, but it is the core of the longevity interest.
Why the longevity scene is paying attention
Three findings from the laboratory fuel the curiosity. In the Interventions Testing Program, canagliflozin extended the life of male mice. A paper in Nature Aging showed in 2024 that SGLT2 inhibition reduces senescent cells in abdominal fat by helping the immune system recognize them better, and that mice with premature aging lived longer. Another mouse study in 2024 found a 5.9 percent longer median survival of male mice under empagliflozin, along with better learning and motor performance. In addition, a large Korean cohort showed a lower risk of dementia under SGLT2 inhibitors compared with another class of diabetes drugs. In user circles, the class is therefore discussed as a candidate for healthspan, alongside metformin and acarbose.
What is well supported
The protection of the heart and kidneys in people who already carry a risk is strongly supported. In EMPA-REG OUTCOME, 7,020 people with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease received empagliflozin or placebo. After a median of 3.1 years, 3.7 percent died of cardiovascular causes under empagliflozin and 5.9 percent under placebo, and all-cause mortality was 5.7 versus 8.3 percent. In heart failure, the picture was repeated in three large trials, with reduced and with preserved ejection fraction, in each case regardless of whether diabetes was present. A meta-analysis of 5 trials with 21,947 participants showed fewer cardiovascular deaths and lower all-cause mortality, HR 0.92. For the kidneys, a Lancet meta-analysis summarizes 13 trials with 90,409 participants: the progression of kidney disease fell by 37 percent, in the 15,605 participants without diabetes just as in those with diabetes.
What the studies show
DAPA-HF: heart failure with and without diabetes
4,744 people with heart failure and an ejection fraction of up to 40 percent received dapagliflozin 10 mg or placebo in addition to standard therapy. After a median of 18.2 months, the primary endpoint of worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death occurred in 16.3 versus 21.2 percent, HR 0.74. All-cause mortality also fell, 11.6 versus 13.9 percent. People without diabetes benefited similarly to people with diabetes.
DAPA-CKD and EMPA-KIDNEY: kidney protection
In DAPA-CKD, 4,304 people with kidney disease received dapagliflozin or placebo. The trial was stopped early because of clear efficacy: the primary kidney endpoint occurred after a median of 2.4 years in 9.2 versus 14.5 percent, and 4.7 versus 6.8 percent had died. EMPA-KIDNEY confirmed this with 6,609 patients for empagliflozin, 13.1 versus 16.9 percent for the primary endpoint; all-cause mortality did not differ significantly there.
DECLARE-TIMI 58: the sober counter-check
17,160 people with type 2 diabetes, most of them without existing vascular disease, received dapagliflozin or placebo for a median of 4.2 years. Heart attack, stroke and cardiovascular death did not become less frequent, 8.8 versus 9.4 percent. Hospital stays for heart failure and kidney events, on the other hand, fell. This shows: the benefit depends strongly on the baseline risk.
Dementia in a Korean cohort
In Korean health insurance data, 110,885 pairs of 40- to 69-year-olds with type 2 diabetes who started either an SGLT2 or a DPP-4 inhibitor were compared. Under SGLT2 inhibitors, dementia was diagnosed less often, HR 0.65, and 0.70 after correction for residual bias. The authors themselves stress that observational data can overestimate the effect and that randomized trials are needed.
Where the data stop
All large trials enrolled patients, with diabetes, heart failure or kidney disease. For healthy people without these diagnoses, there is no randomized trial with hard endpoints or with aging markers. Life extension has so far been shown only in mice, and not consistently there either: in the ITP, only male animals benefited from canagliflozin; for empagliflozin and dapagliflozin we found no published ITP data, and the empagliflozin mouse study is a single paper. The dementia finding comes from observational data. The question of muscle is also open: a meta-analysis of 18 studies found, besides 1.16 kg less fat mass, also 1.01 kg less skeletal muscle mass, whereas an analysis of 5 long-term studies over at least 12 months found no significant loss of fat-free mass. For people in training who want to build muscle, there are no data.
Status, approval and legal
Empagliflozin and dapagliflozin are approved, prescription-only medicines in Germany and the EU, approved for type 2 diabetes, chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease. In the US, both have been approved since 2014. Any use without these diagnoses, for example for longevity or weight loss, is off-label and belongs in the hands of a physician. The heart and kidney trials used 10 mg once daily; this is a figure from the studies, not a recommendation. SGLT2 inhibitors are not named on the 2026 Prohibited List of the World Anti-Doping Agency.
Safety
Safety is well described through approval studies and more than a decade of use. The most common are fungal infections in the genital area, in 4.0 percent under empagliflozin 10 mg versus 1.0 percent under placebo, and under dapagliflozin in women 8.4 versus 1.2 percent. In addition, there are urinary tract infections, increased urination, fluid deficiency and a drop in blood pressure, especially from age 75 and with diuretics. The most important rare complication is ketoacidosis, an acidification by ketone bodies, which can occur even with near-normal blood sugar and, according to the prescribing information, has also been reported in people without diabetes. Risk factors are restricted food intake, severe fluid losses, surgery, acute illness and alcohol. Anyone who fasts or follows a ketogenic diet should know this. Very rare is a severe infection in the perineal area, Fournier’s gangrene. The drugs are not suitable in type 1 diabetes, during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Together with insulin or sulfonylureas, the risk of hypoglycemia increases.
BK-Score Supported, with caveats
| Human evidence | 7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | 9 | |
| Safety data | 9 | |
| Hype gap | 6 | |
| Track record of use | 8 |
Evidence 7: for patients the data are exceptionally strong, with large double-blind trials and hard endpoints, such as DAPA-HF (4,744 patients, HR 0.74), DAPA-CKD (4,304, HR 0.61, all-cause mortality HR 0.69) and a meta-analysis of 13 trials with 90,409 participants (kidney progression -37 %, also without diabetes); for the use sought in biohacking, in healthy people, however, there is not a single randomized trial, only mouse data and one cohort on dementia risk (HR 0.65, Shin 2024), hence not 9. Mechanism 9, because the chain of action has been quantified in humans, with around 78 g of glucose per day in the urine, natriuresis, and lowering of weight and blood pressure; fasting mimicry, by contrast, is a hypothesis. Safety 9, because approvals since 2012 and 2014, endpoint trials over several years and pharmacovigilance are available; known are genital infections, volume depletion and the rare, also euglycemic, ketoacidosis. Hype 6, because the longevity narrative rests largely on real findings, but transfers patient data and mouse studies to healthy people. Use 8, because millions of patients have been treated under medical supervision for more than a decade. Direction positive: the human data point consistently in one direction, but the benefit for healthy people has not been studied.
The score rates the state of knowledge, not the substance. “Safety data 9” means well studied – not harmless.
Subjective assessment by Biohacking Kompakt based on published scoring rules – not a scientific rating and not a medical recommendation. Rules and all ratings (German)
Frequently asked questions about SGLT2 inhibitors (empagliflozin, dapagliflozin)
Do SGLT2 inhibitors extend life?
In patients with heart failure, kidney disease or high-risk diabetes, mortality fell in some large trials. In healthy people this has not been studied. The indications of an extended lifespan come from mouse studies.
What is the difference between empagliflozin, dapagliflozin and canagliflozin?
All three inhibit the same sugar transporter in the kidney. Empagliflozin and dapagliflozin are additionally approved for heart failure and kidney disease. The lifespan data from the ITP mouse program so far exist for canagliflozin, which has its own entry.
Can SGLT2 inhibitors be taken without diabetes?
They are also approved for heart failure and chronic kidney disease without diabetes, and the benefit is established there. Taking them without any of these diagnoses is off-label and belongs in the hands of a physician. There are no studies in healthy people.
Do you lose weight with SGLT2 inhibitors?
A little. In a 24-week study, weight under empagliflozin was 1.93 kg lower than under placebo; in a meta-analysis, 2.73 kg. Part of it is water, part fat; in some analyses some muscle mass also fell.
Are SGLT2 inhibitors risky with fasting or keto?
The prescribing information lists restricted food intake as a risk factor for ketoacidosis, which can occur even with near-normal blood sugar. This combination should therefore only take place under medical supervision. Warning signs are nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, severe thirst and unusual tiredness.
What side effects do SGLT2 inhibitors have?
The most common are fungal infections in the genital area and urinary tract infections. In addition, there are fluid deficiency and a drop in blood pressure. Ketoacidosis is rare, and a severe infection in the perineal area is very rare.
Related
- Related topicCanagliflozin (SGLT2 inhibitor)
- Related topicTelmisartan
- Related topicAcarbose
- Related topicStatins (atorvastatin, rosuvastatin)
- Related topicColchicine (low-dose, cardiovascular prevention)
- Related topicLiraglutide (Saxenda / Victoza)
Sources
- Zinman et al., N Engl J Med 2015 – EMPA-REG OUTCOME
- McMurray et al., N Engl J Med 2019 – DAPA-HF
- Anker et al., N Engl J Med 2021 – EMPEROR-Preserved
- Heerspink et al., N Engl J Med 2020 – DAPA-CKD
- EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group, N Engl J Med 2023 – EMPA-KIDNEY
- Wiviott et al., N Engl J Med 2019 – DECLARE-TIMI 58
- Nuffield Department of Population Health Renal Studies Group, Lancet 2022 – kidney meta-analysis
- Shin et al., BMJ 2024 – dementia risk, Korean cohort
- Katsuumi et al., Nat Aging 2024 – SGLT2 inhibition and senescent cells in mice
- EMA – Jardiance, product information (German)
Open in the database – with search, filters and comparison (German app)
Information only, not medical advice and not a usage or dosage recommendation. Prescription-only and unapproved substances belong in the hands of a physician. Last updated: 2026-09-29.